Voices for a Free Future with Steve Baker

Voices for a Free Future with Steve Baker

Ten Years On: It's Time to EMBRACE a Brighter Post-Brexit Future

A new book, "The Brexit Effect, 2016–2026" edited by Anthony Seldon, contains much I don't like, but I commend to you my chapter with Prof Paul Dolan on how to move on. Goodness knows it is time.

Rt Hon Steve Baker FRSA's avatar
Rt Hon Steve Baker FRSA
Jun 23, 2026
∙ Paid

Brexit was largely a macroeconomic non-event.
– Wolgang Munchau (not a Brexiteer)

On this the tenth anniversary of our vote to leave the EU, I find we are refighting the referendum in the same old terms. Surely it is time to move on and build a brighter future?

But should we? Can we without returning to the EU?

I keep engaging with the arguments of those who want to rejoin, making claims of terrible economic harm. I find those claims don’t stand up, as economist Julian Jessop has been proving.

Julian Jessop
Explainer – debunking the dodgy stats used by Project Rejoin
There is now a bewildering range of estimates for the harm that Brexit is supposed to have done to the UK economy, or the benefits of rejoining the EU. Indeed, pro-EU accounts often present several inconsistent figures as if each were established facts – even in the same post…
Read more
2 months ago · 45 likes · 13 comments · Julian Jessop

Now a new paper from economist Dr Gerard Lyons, published by the Centre for Policy Studies shows that Jessop and pro-EU commentator Wolgang Munchau have been right:

In summary, after the initial temporary shock, there is little to suggest that Brexit has had a material impact on the UK’s economic growth trajectory, either in terms of GDP or GDP per capita. As I pointed out in my 2024 paper, most of the reports of a permanent shock do not stand up under scrutiny.

In truth, leaving the EU left us performing mid pack with competitor EU economies. Covid was the big shock and Germany is the under-performer. Here is the data:

Click to explore the data

So if returning to the EU is not the answer to our economic woes, how can people of good faith engage with one another in a way designed to help them move on?

Toleration is a fundamental principle of a free society: we should be willing and able to agree to disagree where people are doing no harm and move on together. Those of us fighting for a free future should care how toleration can be promoted.

Share

It turns out behavioural scientists, and my friend Prof Paul Dolan in particular, have some great ideas about how to embed tolerance by design and enable “adversarial collaboration”. Paul wrote the book Beliefism: How to stop hating the people we disagree with and together we have founded The Provocation People to offer companies and institutions services to embed a happier and more productive culture of constructive disagreement.

In the final chapter of a new book from Cambridge University Press – The Brexit Effect, 2016–2026 – Paul and I summarise the arguments and set out his EMBRACE framework for better disagreements. I commend our chapter to you.

The Brexit Effect, 2016–2026, edited by Anthony Seldon

Voices for a Free Future with Steve Baker is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

User's avatar

Continue reading this post for free, courtesy of Rt Hon Steve Baker FRSA.

Or purchase a paid subscription.
© 2026 Steve Baker · Publisher Privacy
Substack · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture