Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Colin Wilson's avatar

Hi Albie. Thanks for responding. I'll address your points as well as I can in this concise medium of Comments.

- I'm a paid subscriber - posts are notably normally accurate, with moral clarity, and classically liberal. I come for the first two and some variation around the third!

- You said "One minute, they are cheering speakers who say migrant hotels should be burned down". 1. Who said this? 2. Is this therefore what Reform crowds were cheering? This is a far different statement from what Lucy Connelly actually tweeted and deleted, for example (though what she did say was awful). Unless I'm wrong this felt inaccurate and a slur at least.

- I think citing David Frost for signing the Brexit deal with the ECHR in it, as meaning Reform are 'no antidote', is a bit of a soft target and stretch. I think it's clear he did that through gritted teeth with no viable alternative, and it got softened to 'respect the framework of the ECHR' which gave possible get-outs. Feels a bit unfair on him and a stretch to use this as evidence on 'no antidote'.

- "Nigel Farage is begging for police intervention when violent language is aimed at him". This seemed confused between 'free speech' and 'inciting violence'. If the latter, then Mr Farage is perfectly entitled to ask for police intervention. So this seemed a bit confused/confusing and not a clear argument.

- etc

- But then I see you suggesting that people should back a Reform London Mayoral candidacy, so I'm wondering about your deeper thoughts.

- So as I'm grappling for accuracy and clarity, I also saw your advert/bio as on National Executive of Conservatives LGBT+. Which is fine, but it's also an area I'm struggling to find policy clarity on, hence my questions. I'm sorry if it's clear on the website but I missed it - it just seemed to leave a lot of unanswered questions. I know some who would consider donating but do not, for lack of clear boundaries one way or another.

I hope that helps answer your question. Thanks for the post - free speech!

Expand full comment
Colin Wilson's avatar

An unusually confused post on this account.

Accusations are made here. But incorrect and perhaps defamatory.

Additionally I note Conservatives LGBT+ National Executive. An honest question that the electorate will need answering...

I can see on web a Conservatives LGBT+ constitution with Aims and requests for ££ and events, but no beliefs, values or policies. Am I missing something?

So...

Does that title exclude or include Q? If so why; if not why not?

What else does it contain, definitionally?

What is not allowed in LGBT'+'? (limits).

Which takes preference, safe spaces for women or trans rights?

Do you support LGB International?

All seems vague and hence confused.

Expand full comment
4 more comments...

No posts